• Politics
  • Diversity, equity and inclusion
  • Financial Decision Making
  • Telehealth
  • Patient Experience
  • Leadership
  • Point of Care Tools
  • Product Solutions
  • Management
  • Technology
  • Healthcare Transformation
  • Data + Technology
  • Safer Hospitals
  • Business
  • Providers in Practice
  • Mergers and Acquisitions
  • AI & Data Analytics
  • Cybersecurity
  • Interoperability & EHRs
  • Medical Devices
  • Pop Health Tech
  • Precision Medicine
  • Virtual Care
  • Health equity

Redefining interoperability in healthcare: Beyond the technical jargon | Viewpoint

Opinion
Article

Clinicians recognize the worth of consistent communication and sharing information, and that's the essence of interoperability.

The truth about interoperability is this: it is foundational to solving the health industry’s biggest problems, yet it is largely a mystery to the average healthcare worker.

Image provided by author

Interoperability is essential to solving the health industry’s biggest problems, Dr. Peter Schoch writes.

Most clinicians can recognize the problems that come from a lack of interoperability, but because it is often discussed in technical language and acronyms like APIs, FHIR, QHIN, DICOM and so on, the concept seems inaccessible.

In reality, interoperability is neither a new idea nor a truly confusing concept. Any healthcare worker will recognize the worth of consistent communication and sharing information. At its heart, that’s what interoperability is.

The real challenge lies in building the infrastructure necessary to do that at scale, with limited personnel and resources. Only when we can agree on what interoperability means, break down the technical terminology and sort through the baggage of security, privacy, compliance and regulatory requirements that detract from its adoption will we realize full interoperability.

What is interoperability, really?

Interoperability includes two components––connectivity and meaningful communication. Connectivity is the ability to share information across systems of record, while meaningful communication is what we do with the data before, during or after it is shared. It is data movement and magic. Both components must happen. Just moving data from one place to another is not enough.

Imagine if you had a computer with no internet access via WIFI, or a house that was built but the wiring was not connected to the utility company. You would obviously be limited in what you could do.

Now imagine your house’s wiring was connected to the power source, so you had electricity, but did not have appliances hooked up. You are connected, but it really means nothing in terms of impact to you. Interoperability is the same way. Technical connectivity is a must, but it doesn’t mean much without meaningful communication.

Interoperability is more than a technical challenge

There is a widespread misunderstanding that interoperability is a technical feature that is an add-on or “nice to have” feature, rather than essential. We can get lost in endless software discussions that paralyze us from meaningful change, or we can recognize that the technical aspects are secondary to the purpose behind them.

Rephrasing the conversation in terms of connectivity and communication helps all of us understand that interoperability is actually the very foundation of running a healthcare business.

It may help to focus on the end results, and then reverse-engineer the means from there. What we want is to enable healthcare providers to access complete patient histories, understand context, and make the best possible decisions for their care. This level of integration and information sharing is what allows for personalized treatment plans, proactive management of chronic conditions, and a holistic approach to patient health.

A case study for interoperability

It is easier to define interoperability and understand its significance with a practical example. Picture a primary care physician seeing a patient mid-week, previously treated in the emergency department (ED) for abdominal pain. Despite normal exam and lab results, without access to the CT scan from the ED, the physician may order another CT scan, leading to unnecessary costs and inconvenience.

If, however, healthcare providers are properly communicating and connecting information, that same primary care physician would have immediate access to all previous scan results. They could then make informed decisions, avoiding redundant tests and improving the patient’s experience.

Conclusion

Overcoming the obstacles to achieving full interoperability requires everyone within the world of healthcare to prioritize connectivity and meaningful communication. We are all here to provide the best patient care possible, and that starts with listening––to the patients and to each other. By embracing interoperability as the new standard of care, we begin to pave the way for a more efficient, coordinated, and patient-centered healthcare system.

Dr. Peter Schoch, MD, is the chief health officer at Kno2. He has spent two decades as a primary care physician and another 13 years as a health system physician executive.


Recent Videos
Image: Ron Southwick, Chief Healthcare Executive
Image: Ron Southwick, Chief Healthcare Executive
Image credit: ©Shevchukandrey - stock.adobe.com
Image: Ron Southwick, Chief Healthcare Executive
Image credit: HIMSS
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.